• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Gymnophobics are real-life 'never-nudes'
  • Recommended: Swiss woman's esophagus twisted itself into a corkscrew
  • Recommended: Gray hair cure? Scientists find root cause of discoloration
  • Recommended: Your skin microbes prove you're a 'dog person'

Incredible stories about how wonderfully weird it is to be human. Curious about the way your body or brain ticks? E-mail The Body Odd or check us out on Facebook and Twitter.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 17
    Sep
    2012
    2:39pm, EDT

    Like, California has hella accents, study confirms

    By Meghan Holohan

    The 1982 movie “Fast Times at Ridgemont High” introduced the world to surfer dude Jeff Spicoli and his laidback lingo. Every time Spicoli appears, he treats the audience to some aaawesomes and duudes.

    For people outside of the state, it might seem as if Californians speak like surfer dudes or valley girls -- like, ohmigod. California girls and guys themselves, on the other hand, insist they have no accent at all. Who's right? As it turns out, linguistic researchers aren't even sure: Most existing large-scale linguistic research projects skip the nation's most populous state, as if no one spoke English west of the Mississippi.

    “California is very new. Boston, New York, the Northeastern accents are really set in stone because the population has been speaking English [for a long time].  And in California, it is still in the making,” explains Penny Eckhert, a professor of linguistics at Stanford University. (Eckhert herself hails from New Jersey, but speaks without the telltale accent.)

    Eckert and a team of researchers descended upon the non-costal towns of Redding and Merced in the Central Valley to interview residents and indentify California accents and dialect. After the researchers gathered interviews with as many residents as they can, they apply it to a speech corpus to analyze spoken language.    

    Californians may like to brag about having no accent, but Eckert says that isn’t true: “Everybody has an accent. An accent is just a way of pronouncing a language and people notice ones that tend to be associated with a particular place.” (Actually, you can watch Bill Hader, Kristen Wiig and Fred Armisen prove the existence of the California accent -- by mocking it -- in this "Saturday Night Live" sketch.)

    She found that many Californians share common traits with people in the Midwest or the South, showing that Dust Bowl migration influenced dialect.

    “A pattern that is well-known in the parts of the Midwest and Pennsylvania and Ohio is called the positive anymore, (such as) 'I shop there anymore,'” she says, explaining most people use anymore in a negative construction, such as “I don’t shop there anymore.” 

    “We found that all over California and did not expect it.”

    She also learned that many Californians use a nasally "a," found often in the Midwest. Once when she was interviewing a student at a Palo Alto high school, he complained the school was too homogenous, noting there weren’t a lot of “blocks.” After a moment, she realized he said "blacks."

    Some Californians share commonalities with Southerners, notably the switch between was and were. Many Southerners say, “We was at the store” instead of, “We were at the store," and Californians also sometimes swapped was and were. She also observed that Californians blended pen/pin, with speakers saying both words the same, much like people in the South.

    “The diversity of California is something that does not get seen as a distance,” Eckert says. 

    In September, the team gathered data in Bakersfield. While a new location for fieldwork hasn’t been identified yet, Eckert plans on studying as many cities as possible.

    You can learn more about the project at Stanford's Voices of California project page. 

    Related:

    • Talking with your hands is innate
    • Are some brains better at learning languages?
    • Teen can read any word backward. Aohw.

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    193 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, psychology, behavior, linguistics, featured, amee-shah
  • 15
    May
    2012
    6:58am, EDT

    Talking with your hands is innate, study finds

    By Brian Alexander, NBC News Contributor

    Good news for those of you who are so self-conscious about gesturing when speaking you issue that “I use my hands when I talk” line: You can stop apologizing. 

    As Spencer Kelly, the co-director of Colgate University’s Center for Language and the Brain will tell The Acoustics 2012 Hong Kong scientific conference later today, gesturing is integral to language. In fact, he argues, it’s “innate.”

    “Blind people gesture, even if they are blind from birth,” he explained in an interview. “They often gesture even when talking to other blind people. So there is some kind of predisposition to using our hands.”

    A recent experiment he conducted shows that gesturing as speech is different from actions upon real objects. It’s more like language.

    He placed EEG devices on the heads of subjects to monitor the electricity inside their brains as they viewed videos of people speaking. In some, people used gestures. In others, people took a real action on a real object. For example, in one scene, people pantomimed stirring a cup of coffee, in another, they stirred an actual cup of coffee. Scenes also depicted both gestures, and real use of an object, that were incongruent with the words so that, say, “He found the answer” was accompanied by a gesture indicating stirring something in a cup.

    As the subjects viewed the videos, Kelly and colleagues looked for a specific electrical signal that indicates how strongly the brain is integrating one piece of information with another.

    The results indicated that test subjects had more difficulty integrating words and real actions, than they did words and gestures. They also had more trouble integrating words with incongruent gestures than they did real actions.

    So real actions tended to interfere with understanding speech, while gestures helped, but incongruent gestures interfered with understanding words while there was no difference between the amount of difficulty real actions posed whether they were incongruent or not.

    That means, Kelly believes, that the brain views gestures as speech, but actions on objects as unrelated to speech. “That is kind of a controversial theory,” he said, “but my work and that of colleagues interested in testing it shows that gesture is more part of language than actions on objects.”

    Gesturing, he thinks, has evolved. “I think it started with concrete interactions with objects,” he explained. “If I wanted to show you how to build a fire, I would bang two rocks together.” Over time, the real action was replaced by symbolic gestures and words. “Language is the ultimate abstraction,” he said. “Gesturing is a sort of middle ground between doing something and talking about something.” 

    Other experiments have shown that gestures are interpreted by the auditory cortex of the brain, like speech. And, interestingly, people with Broca’s aphasia, which can be caused by a stroke that damages the frontal gyrus, which pays a role in speech production, also have trouble gesturing.

    So gesturing really does appear to be important for making ourselves understood. “The cool thing is,” Kelly said, “that if you’ve not thought about it, and then you start, you see it all the time. In fact, I’m talking to you right now on the phone and I’m gesturing.”

    Brian Alexander (www.BrianRAlexander.com) is co-author, with Larry Young PhD., of "The Chemistry Between Us: Love Sex and the Science of Attraction," (www.TheChemistryBetweenUs.com)  to be published Sept. 13.

    Related:

    Are some brains better at learning languages?

    Teen can say any word backward. How?!

    Dyslexics can't ID voices

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    14 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, behavior, featured
  • 8
    May
    2012
    8:32pm, EDT

    Brains of bilingual readers repress negative words

    By LiveScience Staff

    Reading a nasty word in a second language may not pack the punch it would in your native tongue, thanks to an unconscious brain quirk that tamps down potentially disturbing emotions, a new study finds.

    When reading negative words such as "failure" in their non-native language, bilingual Chinese-English speakers did not show the same brain response as seen when they read neutral words such as "aim." The finding suggests that the brain can process the meaning of words in the unconscious, while "withholding" information from our conscious minds.

    "We devised this experiment to unravel the unconscious interactions between the processing of emotional content and access to the native language system. We think we've identified, for the first time, the mechanism by which emotion controls fundamental thought processes outside consciousness," study researcher Yanjing Wu, a psychologist at Bangor University in the United Kingdom, said in a statement. "Perhaps this is a process that resembles the mental repression mechanism that people have theorized about but never previously located."

    Bilingual people typically respond less emotionally to words in their second language. For example, swear words in a foreign tongue don't usually feel as shocking; likewise, some research has found that people are more comfortable talking about embarrassing topics in a second language. [ 7 Thoughts That Are Bad For You ]

    To unravel the emotions of language, Wu and his colleague Guillaume Thierry, also of Bangor University, recruited 15 native English speakers, 15 native Chinese speakers, and 15 native Chinese speakers who were also fluent in English (all had first learned English around age 12). They set up an experiment in which these volunteers saw word pairs on a screen. One of the words was always neutral, while the other could be neutral, positive or negative. In addition, each word was two syllables in Chinese, with the first syllable of each word always sounding the same.

    For example, the positive word "honesty" was paired with the neutral word "program." In Chinese, honesty translates to "chengshi" and program to "chengxu." Negative words included failure, war, discomfort and unfortunate.

    The participants were asked to push a button if the words were linked in meaning. (In some pairs, they were.) Meanwhile, the scientists used electrodes on the scalp to measure the electrical response in the brain to reading these pairs of words.

    The findings revealed that although they weren't aware of it, the bilingual participants' brains were translating the positive and neutral words into Chinese as they read them in English. But surprisingly, this response was absent when they read negative words.

    "We were extremely surprised by our finding," Thierry said in a statement. "We were expecting to find modulation between the different words — and perhaps a heightened reaction to the emotional word — but what we found was the exact opposite to what we expected — a cancellation of the response to the negative words."

    It's not yet clear why the brain dampens the response to these words, the researchers report Tuesday (May 8) in the Journal of Neuroscience

    "We think this is a protective mechanism," Thierry said. "We know that in trauma, for example, people behave very differently. Surface conscious processes are modulated by a deeper emotional system in the brain. Perhaps this brain mechanism spontaneously minimizes negative impact of disturbing emotional content on our thinking, to prevent causing anxiety or mental discomfort."

    More from LiveScience:

    • Top 10 Mysteries of the Mind
    • 10 Things You Didn't Know About the Brain
    • Top Ten Unexplained Phenomena 

    More from The Body Odd:

    • Are some brains better at learning languages?
    • Teen can say any word backward. How?!

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, psychology, behavior, featured
  • 19
    Mar
    2012
    7:49pm, EDT

    Are some brains better at learning languages?

    By Emily Sohn
    Discovery Channel
    In his spare time, an otherwise ordinary 16-year old boy from New York taught himself Hebrew, Arabic, Russian, Swahili, and a dozen other languages, the New York Times reported last week.

    And even though it's not entirely clear how close to fluent Timothy Doner is in any of his studied languages, the high school sophomore -- along with other polyglots like him -- are certainly different from most Americans, who speak one or maybe two languages.

    That raises the question: Is there something unique about certain brains, which allows some people to speak and understand so many more languages than the rest of us?

    The answer, experts say, seems to be yes, no and it's complicated. For some people, genes may prime the brain to be good at language learning, according to some new research. And studies are just starting to pinpoint a few brain regions that are extra-large or extra-efficient in people who excel at languages.

    NEWS: Breaking the Code: Why Yuor Barin Can Raed Tihs

    For others, though, it's more a matter of being determined and motivated enough to put in the hours and hard work necessary to learn new ways of communicating.

    "Kids do well in what they like," said Michael Paradis, a neurolinguist at McGill University in Montreal, who compared language learning to piano, sports or anything else that requires discipline. "Kids who love math do well in math. He loves languages and is doing well in languages."

    "This is just an extreme case of a general principle," he added. "If you practice and have a great deal of motivation for a particular domain, you're going to be able to improve in that domain beyond normal limits."

    Very young children are remarkably good at learning multiple languages simultaneously. They can develop native-sounding accents in each tongue. And into adulthood, all reinforced languages hold their own in the brain without interfering with the others -- unlike later learners who may have trouble remembering a second language when they begin to learn a third. 

    With age, though, it not only becomes tougher to learn new languages, there may even be developmental stages beyond which certain nuances of language simply become inaccessible. By the age of 9 to 12 months, for example, babies begin to lose the ability to distinguish between sounds that are not used in their native language, said Loraine Obler, a neurolinguist at the CUNY Graduate Center in New York.

    After about age 4, most people will never gain a truly deep grasp on a second language's morphology, which refers to the rules that govern how words are formed from linguistic units. After age 7 or so, the brain begins to pay more attention to what it's learning, Paradis said, which affects the type of memory kids use to pick up languages.

    And beyond puberty, it becomes unlikely that someone will be able to speak a new language without a foreign accent, though Doner is unique in how impressive his accent sounds, which may reflect a late-to-mature brain. (There seems to be no cut-off point for learning vocabulary).

    For more than a century, scientists have known that there are key areas on the exterior cortex of the brain's left hemisphere, known as Broca's area and Wernicke's area, that are critical for learning to speak and understanding speech, Obler said. There are also many other areas throughout the brain that process language.

    Genes, neurotransmitters and brain regions involved in long-term memory play roles as well, Paradis said. And a number of different structures probably come into play when people speak a second language compared to when they speak their first.

    That would explain why brain damage from Parkinson's, Alzheimer's or other disorders that affect specific areas of the brain can knock out just a native language -- or just a language that was learned later in life, leaving the other one intact. Aging can also bring out an accent that was once unnoticeable.

    NEWS: Bilingualism Good for the Brain

    Only in the last few years have scientists begun to zero in on brain regions that seem to matter most in helping polyglots develop their impressive skills.

    In a 2008 study in the journal Cerebral Cortex, for example, researchers found better language learning abilities in college students with a larger Heschl's gyrus, an area on the left side of the brain that processes pitch. But that finding only applies to learning tonal languages like Mandarin, said study author Patrick Wong, a neuroscientist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.

    In another study, published last year in the Journal of Neuroscience, Wong's group found that good language learners had stronger connectivity in the white matter of the auditory cortex, which is part of the language network. And in studies currently in press, the team will announce better efficiency in connections between neurons as well as a genetic component to the whole system.

    And it's not just polyglots who are providing clues, Obler added. In her research on people who struggle with new languages, she has found parallels with dyslexia.

    Yet, even as research reveals biological clues in the brains of polyglots or their opposites, we are probably not completely fated to either excel or fail at languages. Our biology may simply determine which strategy we should use to learn new dialects.

    "You're not doomed just because your Heschl's gyrus is small," Wong said. "The goal in our research program is to find predictors. And once we find predictors, we can put people into the right kind of training program."

    But the field of neurolinguistics is still new. So for now, the process of language learning in the brain remains full of secrets.

    As Obler said, someone once "wanted to know how to make the brains of merely normal learners as good as excellent learners. I said, 'I'm not going to be able to answer that for decades.'"  

    Related: 

    • Why yuor barin can raed tihs
    • Teen can say any word backward. How?!
    • Girl has tongue surgery to speak Korean

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    9 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, behavior, featured
  • 10
    Feb
    2012
    3:59pm, EST

    Cracking the code: Why yuor barin can raed tihs

    By Natalie Wolchover
    LifesLittleMysteries 
    You might not realize it, but your brain is a code-cracking machine.

    For emaxlpe, it deson't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod aepapr, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pcale. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit pobelrm.

    S1M1L4RLY, Y0UR M1ND 15 R34D1NG 7H15 4U70M471C4LLY W17H0U7 3V3N 7H1NK1NG 4B0U7 17.

    Window Installed Into a Live Brain

    Passages like these have been bouncing around the Internet for years. But how do we read them? And what do our incredibly low standards for what's legible say about the way our brains work?

    According to Marta Kutas, a cognitive neuroscientist and the director of the Center for Research in Language at the University of California, San Diego, the short answer is that no one knows why we're so good at reading garbled nonsense. But they've got strong suspicions.

    "My guess is that context is very, very, very important," Kutas told Life's Little Mysteries.

    We use context to pre-activate the areas of our brains that correspond to what we expect next, she explained. For example, brain scans reveal that if we hear a sound that leads us to strongly suspect another sound is on the way, the brain acts as if we're already hearing the second sound. Similarly, if we see a certain collection of letters or words, our brains jump to conclusions about what comes next. "We use context to help us perceive," Kutas said. [ 6 Fun Ways to Exercise Your Brain ]

    It's not a perfect system, however. In the above passages, Kutas suspects that you probably didn't get every single word right just from knowing what came before it. You onlythought you were reading the passage perfectly, because you automatically (and subconsciously) went back and filled in any gaps in your knowledge based on subsequent context — the words that came later.

    Additionally, in the case of the first example (the words with jumbled middle letters), it helps that your brain processes all the letters of a word at once, rather than one at a time. Thus, the letters "serve as contexts for each other," Kutas said.

    Computer Chip Works Like Artificial Brain

    In the case of the second passage (with the numbers in place of some letters), a 2007 study by cognitive scientists in Spain found that reading such passages barely activates the brain areas that correspond to digits. This suggests that the letter-like appearance of the digits, as well as their context, has a stronger influence on our brains than their actual status as digits. The researchers think some sort of top-down feedback mechanism (our consciences telling our sensory processors what to do, sort of) normalizes the visual input, allowing us to ignore the funny bits and read the passage with ease.

    More From LiveScience:

    • The Most Amazing Optical Illusions (and How They Work)
    • 10 Weird Things Humans Do Every Day, and Why
    • 10 Things You Didn't Know About the Brain 

    More from The Body Odd:

    • Teen can say any word backward. How?! 
    • When time is money, misery can follow
    • Confirmed: Scrabble players are smarter than the rest of us

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    42 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, behavior, featured, neuroscience
  • 1
    Feb
    2012
    7:00am, EST

    Teen can say any word backward. How?!

    Alyssa Kramer, a 14-year-old YouTube star from Oklahoma, says her unusual talent, speaking backwards, is easy because "my brain flips it for me." Matt Lauer and Ann Curry put her to the test live.

    By Melissa Dahl, NBC News

    Alyssa Kramer can say any word backward.

    Assyla Remark nac yas yna drow drawkcacb.

    The 14-year-old from Poteau, Okla., can flip words around and spit them back out almost instantly -- it took me, on the other hand, like 45 seconds to just write that sentence backwards. 

    Thanks to Alyssa's weird mental rewind button, she's become something of an Internet celebrity -- her YouTube video has gotten more than 1 million hits. 

    Here's the video that launched Alyssa to mini-stardom.

     

    Watch on YouTube

    OK, fine, she is maybe saying "huh?" to buy time when facing some of the longer words -- kaleidoscope, withdrawal, Lamborghini. But still -- impressive, right? Absolutely. But Andrew Levine can easily pu-eno Alyssa.

    Levine, a research professor in philosophy at the University of Maryland at College Park, can speak entire sentences backward, in the four languages he knows (that's English, French, German and Italian, if you're interested) and in languages he's unfamiliar with. When asked what's happening in his mind when he speaks in backward gibberish, Levine can't say.

    "If this girl is doing it the same way I'm doing it, it's nothing. It's like you're speaking another language," Levine says. "In fact, I think that I am effectively bilingual, in the sense that if you were genuinely bilingual, nothing would be going on in your brain." In other words, Levine doesn't consciously think, "TODAY: Y-A-D-O-T." He's just come to innately understand that TODAY backwards is YADOT, sort of like a person bilingual in Spanish and English knows that the words "today" and "hoy" are different ways of saying the same thing. 

    Send idea Send me your story ideas

    Facebook Follow us on Facebook

    Twitter Follow me on Twitter

    About 30 years ago, Levine experienced a brief, weird brush with fame similar to the one Alyssa's experiencing now: He was a guest on "The Tonight Show" with Johnny Carson and was, he says, "a huge hit in Japan." He was also one of the subjects of a series of studies done back then on backward speech, conducted by Lewis Leavitt and then-graduate student Nelson Cowan.

    Leavitt says he was curious whether a knack for reverse speech required an unusually strong memory; instead, they found it seems to require no particular special talents or heightened understanding of the English language. Backward-speakers like Levine seem to have taught themselves to hear each word sound-by-sound (or phoneme-by-phoneme, in academic speak). Alyssa, on the other hand, says she sees the word spelled in her head, and she's able to mentally flip it around and pronounce it.

    "Backward speech is one of these things that seems to be an equal opportunity skill," explains Leavitt, who's now professor emeritus of pediatrics at University of Wisconsin, Madison. He illustrates this fact with some brief sketches of a handful of those study participants: a Stanford professor, a woman in the UK's House of Lords, a "German striptease artist." The stripper, incidentally, used to include backward speech in her act, and sent Levine a tape so he could check it out. "The striptease itself wasn't all that interesting, but her facility of backward speech was really quite impressive," Leavitt says.

    The point is: Backward speakers come from all sorts of backgrounds, although they do have a few things in common. "They tend to be kids who do very well in school, who are smart and who have a decent-size vocabulary, but they are not necessarily kids who have a spectacular memory," Leavitt says. "So it's a skill that they practice, just like the violin."

    Starting at around age 8 and tapering off around 13, kids tend to become interested in playing with language -- they might create their own language or make up one with a friend, or they might play around with backward speech. Most kids move on, but a few stick with it. Around this age, Leavitt explains, kids are getting huge bursts of brain power, while at the same time honing their social skills. That cognitive combo helps explain why this tends to be an age of all sorts of "obsessions," some more useful than others: Justin Bieber, "Twilight," a particular video game. In Alyssa's case, it seems backward speech may have been the thing to take hold.

    "It's a combination of new cultural, as well as cognitive, prowess, and that's shown in a lot of their activities. And for some, it's developing certain special interests," Leavitt explains. "If you reflect back on your own childhood, you may even find something you were really into at that time." (A fascinating October episode of "This American Life" explores this idea in greater detail.)

    In many cases, the things kids obsess over -- Bieber, backward talk, whatever -- may be helping them figure out where they fit in the world, but most of these esoteric interests aren't exactly going to lead to lucrative career options. Back in the early 1980s, when Levine appeared on TV and in newspapers all across the world, people kept telling him, Get an agent! Start an act!

    He stuck with academia.

    "It was funny 30 years ago," he remembers, "and if it had led to a career on 'Hollywood Squares' or something, I would've stayed with it." 

    Can you (or a friend or family member) klat drawkcab? Brag about it on our Facebook page.

    Related:

    • Teen has tongue surgery to speak Korean. Huh?
    • More college women speak in creaks, thanks to pop stars
    • Pahking the cah? Regional accents getting stronger

    71 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: teenagers, speech, language, behavior, featured, childrens-health, amazing-people
  • 9
    Sep
    2011
    9:16am, EDT

    Pahking the cah? Regional accents getting stronger

    By Cari Nierenberg

    Although the United States is an international melting pot and the average American makes a dozen moves in a lifetime, regional accents are alive and well. In fact, regional accents are becoming stronger and more different from each other, says William Labov, a professor of linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, although it's not entirely clear why.

    One possibility, says Labov, is that these original sound differences are being exaggerated, like trains moving in opposite directions on two railroad tracks. "The other is that dialect differences have become associated with political differences, so that the Blue States/Red States division comes close to the boundary between the Northern and Midland dialects," he explains.  

    Labov says that our dialects change little after age 18 and we tend to retain the accent we grew up with. Young people first match the dialects of their parents, but then they often change to match their peers. These changes, though, are unconscious, he explains.

    Linguists say there are about ten major regional accents in the US, such as New England, mid-Atlantic, Inland North, for the cities surrounding the Great Lakes, and the West, the country's newest dialect. While some people sound more regional than others, everyone has an accent to some degree.

    Some people are simply better at repressing some aspects of their local speech. The way they talk -- their pronounciation of words (some "r-less" dialects on the East Coast may say "cah" rather than "car") or choice of words ("pail" in the North versus "bucket" in the Midwest) -- adds a local flavor and diversity to speech. But it can also contribute to misunderstandings and confusion (hearing the word "buses" as "bosses").

    While some people keep their regional speech styles because it's the hallmark of who they are and a tie to their communities, certain accents may have negative stereotypes or societal prejudices associated with them, says Amee Shah, director of the Research Laboratory in Speech Acoustics & Perception at Cleveland State University in Cleveland, Ohio.

    Although there's nothing wrong with a regional accent, some people become ashamed or self-conscious of them for either personal or professional reasons and they want to tone them down.

    Shah, who has training as a speech-language pathologist and has designed an assessment tool to measure the severity of accented speech, offers "accent modification therapy" to clients. Shah says a strong accent might take six to eight months to modify, a moderate one three or four months, and a light accent a month or two.

    "My goal is to help a client modify an accent, not to correct or reduce it," says Shah.

    Have you ever misunderstood a regional accent (with humorous results)? Or do you lapse into regional speech patterns when home?

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    285 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, accents, linguistics
  • 19
    Aug
    2011
    2:36pm, EDT

    Confirmed: Scrabble players are smarter than everyone else

    William B. Plowman / Getty Images file

    Competitive Scrabble players are pushing brain boundaries, a new study shows.

    By Andrew Winner

    A new study confirms what Scrabble players have long suspected: We really are smarter than the rest of you.

    Researchers at the University of Calgary have discovered that competitive Scrabble players are able to increase visual word recognition -- the ability to read individual words -- well into adulthood.

    “Visual word recognition is a difficult skill to master, and it develops from childhood through adulthood,” study author Ian Hargreaves, a graduate student from the University of Calgary, wrote in an e-mail. “Most of the previous research on word recognition has used adulthood (essentially, undergraduate students, as these are the participants in most research studies) as the model for the end-point of development.”

    “Our study helps shine some light on how even in adulthood, visual word recognition is flexible, and can be modified with dedicated training.”

    In one of the study’s tasks, research participants were presented with a series of words, oriented both vertically and horizontally. Subject participants were asked to guess which words were valid words, with their responses timed.

    Other tasks included creating anagrams (A Manic’s Errant Gag?) and creating words beginning with a certain letter.

    Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Scrabble players bested the control group in every category related to Scrabble.  Hargreaves noted that his group took great pains to make Scrabble experience the independent variable, accounting for a wide variety of factors including age, vocabulary, exposure to printed materials and speed of perceptual processing.

    The findings are notable because little research has been done into progress in visual word recognition past early adulthood. (Most studies are completed using the most available of test subjects: undergrads.)  

    The game of Scrabble, it appears, can actively improve word recognition in an adult mind. Hargreaves observed study participants of adult ages showing extraordinarily intellectual dexterity in the categories tested.

    “I think that it's safe to say that there is plenty of evidence showing that exercising yourself, whether physically or mentally, can carry positive benefits,” Hargreaves added. “What these results suggest is that with dedicated practice, even seemingly basic skills (like deciding if something is a real word or not) can be shaped by experience.”

    Hargreaves doesn’t necessarily believe this super-intelligence can be passed on to crossword aficionados and players of Words With Friends.

    “The extent to which these Scrabble-specific skills transfer to other areas of reading and memory is something that we hope to continue investigating,” Hargreaves said.

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    30 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, featured, scrabble
  • 5
    Aug
    2011
    5:52pm, EDT

    'Who is this?!' Dyslexics can't ID voices, study shows

    By Rita Rubin

    Recognizing written words is tough enough for people with dyslexia. But a new study suggests the disorder might also make it harder to recognize the voices of people as they speak.

    Although dyslexia is regarded as a reading disability, it might be more accurate to think of it as a language disability, the authors say.

    People with dyslexia are thought to have difficulty connecting the sound of words with their meaning, so the MIT researchers theorized that their ability to identify speakers’ voices might be impaired. After all, one key component of distinguishing speakers’ voices is how they pronounce words.

    To test that hypothesis, they recruited college students with and without dyslexia whose hearing was fine.

    The researchers tested their ability to recognize speakers in their native English and in a completely foreign language, Chinese.

    “People have shown before that you do better at recognizing voices in a language you know than in a language you don’t know,” says senior author John Gabrieli, a neuroscientist.

    If you don’t have dyslexia, that is.

    In each language, participants first learned to associate five talkers’ voices with unique cartoon avatars and then were tested on their ability to identify those voices.

    So as not to provide any clues that would increase participants’ chances of correctly matching the avatars to the voices, all of the speakers were young men without obvious accents.

    When asked to identify the English-speakers, Gabrieli and his coauthors reported July 29 in Science, the people with dyslexia were wrong half the time—much worse than the people who weren’t dyslexic, who missed only 30 percent.

    Chinese was another matter. Study participants with dyslexia performed just as poorly when trying to identify the Chinese-speakers as they did with the English-speakers. But this time, the people who weren’t dyslexic missed as many as those with dyslexia. They couldn’t recognize any words, so they couldn’t identify the Chinese speakers on the basis of their pronunciation.

    The dyslexic student’s impaired ability to recognize voices was interesting but didn’t present a big problem in their daily lives, Gabrieli says. Oh, sure, he talked to a dyslexic BBC reporter who liked to listen to radio serials and got frustrated trying to figure out which character was speaking. But the woman is a BBC reporter, so she’s not doing too badly.

    This line of research could lead to detecting dyslexia in children before they even know how to read, Gabrieli says, noting “there is evidence that early intervention is much more effective than later intervention.”

    He and his coathors are now using functional MRI imaging to see whether the brains of people with dyslexia look different that the brains of people without it while trying to name that voice.

    How are you at recognizing voices? Can you easily place the celebrity voiceover in a commercial or the latest animated feature?

    Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

    1 comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: language, featured, dyslexia

Browse

  • featured,
  • behavior,
  • psychology,
  • health,
  • melissa-dahl,
  • sleep,
  • diane-mapes,
  • neurology,
  • skin-and-beauty,
  • memory,
  • diet-and-nutrition,
  • curious-condition,
  • inquiring-minds,
  • mental-health,
  • brain,
  • mens-health,
  • alcohol,
  • music,
  • neuroscience,
  • allergies,
  • relationships,
  • smell,
  • senses,
  • science,
  • vision,
  • aging,
  • language,
  • diet,
  • brian-alexander,
  • speech,
  • dreams,
  • lying,
  • taste,
  • sex,
  • halloween,
  • fitness,
  • better-living-through-science,
  • singing,
  • phobias,
  • sexual-health,
  • jonel-aleccia,
  • skin,
  • laughter
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Meghan Holohan

Brian Alexander

is an author and frequent contributor to NBC News. His most recent book, written with Larry Young, PhD, is "The Chemistry Between Us: Love, Sex, and the Science of Attraction." He’s also author of “America Unzipped: In Search of Sex and Satisfaction,” and “Rapture: How Biotech Became the New Religion.”

Brian Alexander Blogroll

  • Twitter

Melissa Dahl, NBC News

Melissa Dahl is a health writer and editor at msnbc.com and TODAY.com.

Melissa Dahl, NBC News Blogroll

  • Boing Boing
  • FitSugar
  • The Beauty Brains
  • No More Dirty Looks
  • The Hairpin
  • Follow on Twitter

Cari Nierenberg

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (6)
    • April (22)
    • March (21)
    • February (18)
    • January (26)
  • 2012
    • December (17)
    • November (21)
    • October (26)
    • September (24)
    • August (33)
    • July (35)
    • June (25)
    • May (34)
    • April (24)
    • March (33)
    • February (29)
    • January (12)
  • 2011
    • December (18)
    • November (30)
    • October (29)
    • September (30)
    • August (33)
    • July (39)
    • June (46)
    • May (32)
    • April (28)
    • March (25)
    • February (19)
    • January (26)
  • 2010
    • December (23)
    • November (19)
    • October (20)
    • September (23)
    • August (24)
    • July (25)
    • June (22)
    • May (11)
    • April (2)
    • March (3)
    • February (2)
    • January (1)
  • 2009
    • November (1)
    • October (4)
    • September (5)
    • August (1)
    • June (2)
    • April (2)
    • March (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (4)
    • October (4)
    • September (3)
    • August (4)
    • July (5)
    • June (3)
    • May (3)
    • April (4)
    • March (5)
    • February (5)
    • January (4)

Most Commented

  • Gymnophobics are real-life 'never-nudes' (188)
  • Missing parts? Salamander regeneration secret revealed (1)

Other blogs

  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • The Body Odd on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise