Cracking the code: Why yuor barin can raed tihs

By Natalie Wolchover
LifesLittleMysteries 
You might not realize it, but your brain is a code-cracking machine.

For emaxlpe, it deson't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod aepapr, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pcale. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit pobelrm.

S1M1L4RLY, Y0UR M1ND 15 R34D1NG 7H15 4U70M471C4LLY W17H0U7 3V3N 7H1NK1NG 4B0U7 17.

Window Installed Into a Live Brain

Passages like these have been bouncing around the Internet for years. But how do we read them? And what do our incredibly low standards for what's legible say about the way our brains work?

According to Marta Kutas, a cognitive neuroscientist and the director of the Center for Research in Language at the University of California, San Diego, the short answer is that no one knows why we're so good at reading garbled nonsense. But they've got strong suspicions.

"My guess is that context is very, very, very important," Kutas told Life's Little Mysteries.

We use context to pre-activate the areas of our brains that correspond to what we expect next, she explained. For example, brain scans reveal that if we hear a sound that leads us to strongly suspect another sound is on the way, the brain acts as if we're already hearing the second sound. Similarly, if we see a certain collection of letters or words, our brains jump to conclusions about what comes next. "We use context to help us perceive," Kutas said. [ 6 Fun Ways to Exercise Your Brain ]

It's not a perfect system, however. In the above passages, Kutas suspects that you probably didn't get every single word right just from knowing what came before it. You onlythought you were reading the passage perfectly, because you automatically (and subconsciously) went back and filled in any gaps in your knowledge based on subsequent context — the words that came later.

Additionally, in the case of the first example (the words with jumbled middle letters), it helps that your brain processes all the letters of a word at once, rather than one at a time. Thus, the letters "serve as contexts for each other," Kutas said.

Computer Chip Works Like Artificial Brain

In the case of the second passage (with the numbers in place of some letters), a 2007 study by cognitive scientists in Spain found that reading such passages barely activates the brain areas that correspond to digits. This suggests that the letter-like appearance of the digits, as well as their context, has a stronger influence on our brains than their actual status as digits. The researchers think some sort of top-down feedback mechanism (our consciences telling our sensory processors what to do, sort of) normalizes the visual input, allowing us to ignore the funny bits and read the passage with ease.

More From LiveScience:

More from The Body Odd:

Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

Discuss this post

Kutas suspects that you probably didn't get every single word right

Actually, I did and at the same speed as I normally read. Same with the second passage.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:45 PM EST

this only works part of the time and only if yo know the correct spelling

Try butter and batter

The brain is lazy and take short cuts

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:31 PM EST

I didn't do so well with the second passage. The numbers screwed me up. But then, I can't read text-speak either.

    #1.2 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:33 PM EST

    If you are a slave to dictionary spelling, then you might have a hard time.

    If you are loke ohtres throughout most of human history, and there was no concensus on spelling, then you could read it easily.

    With civilization (spelling wise) comes dumbing down.

      #1.3 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:03 PM EST

      Yahe, tihs is why poelpe cna cruse unigs mspillsed dowrs adn hte fliter deons't ctach it.

        #1.4 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:29 AM EST

        boohoo Will, Filters arent fool proof.

          #1.5 - Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:16 PM EST

          Will, you idiot. Read the article already. You have to leave the first and last letters in the same place. "cna" doesn't work...at all, simply because it has three letters. "Yahe" doesn't work either. It goes on and on, but I think the others can catch them.

            #1.6 - Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:05 PM EST
            Reply

            Very interesting, as Arte Johnson used to say. But it still doesn't legitimize all the misspellings in posts on this or other sights.

            • 6 votes
            Reply#2 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:27 PM EST

            Sites! As in, locations.

            • 9 votes
            #2.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:01 AM EST

            me preferred sites as in another web page to read something for news... doesn't have to be on another websie computer at a different geographic location.

              #2.2 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:29 AM EST

              dam strate bloomer

              • 1 vote
              #2.3 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:27 PM EST

              I had to laugh. It was interesting, I didn't have a problem reading any of them but I did giggle at the:

              You onlythought you were reading the passage perfectly, because you automatically....

              Was the lack of space between onlythought another test? All in good fun.

              • 2 votes
              #2.4 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:08 PM EST
              Reply

              This is good news for most republicans because they have IQ's in the single digit range. Otherwuse theu wood no7 b abel to comunikate effctively, refudiate mee goe one. ROFLMAO!

              • 2 votes
              Reply#3 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:07 PM EST

              Me 2. RFLOAMO!

              • 1 vote
              #3.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:04 PM EST

              Really? Was bringing politics into this really that necessary just for a cheap (unfunny) joke? Freakin' trolls.

              • 2 votes
              #3.2 - Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:07 AM EST
              Reply

              The spelling isn't any worse than what I usually see from the far left ghetto trash people that post on here.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#4 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:21 PM EST

              I wonder if the construction of the language matters? Does this also apply to Pictographic languages(Chinese, Korean, Arabic, etc)?

              • 2 votes
              Reply#5 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:38 PM EST

              Arabic isn't a pictographic language :)

                #5.1 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:14 PM EST
                Reply

                "We use context to help us perceive,"

                So, a lie is not good context so in order to lie well one has to add context to the lie so others can better perceive it?. In other words, it is hard for an outsider to lie to a group of people until the outsider add context to the lie? Hmm, how do we tell if an insider tells a lie ? How does one train the brain to perceive context that is not true and judge that the deciphered message is a lie?

                  Reply#6 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:40 AM EST

                  Remember, in engineering it is better to have a workable lie, than an unweildy truth! LOL

                    #6.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:06 PM EST

                    Is that like using an hypothesis in a scientific process? It's not just engineers you know, heh heh

                      #6.2 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:10 PM EST
                      Reply

                      One doesn’t consciously see anything that is written, typed or printed on a piece of paper or a PC screen. Only their eyes see it, and like 2 video cameras, they transmit that “sensed” data directly to the subconscious mind via the Optic Nerves in a multi-bit (pixel) parallel format.

                      Upon receipt of a per say “frame” of sensed data the subconscious executes a per say “word search” of one’s stored memories for a “best match” to the input data and whatever that “best match” turns out to be, if anything, the subconscious will retrieve/recall any “linked” data associated with it (aka: the meaning of the “word”) and tell the conscious mind (aka: posts a “thought” in one’s conscious mind).

                      Thus, when one reads those words with transposed letters, the “best match” thought that is posted to the conscious mind is the “meaning” of the correctly spelled “word”. But when one is reading a “sentence” the next word in sequence is used to determine said “best match”. This is easily demonstrated bananas by your reading of this vanilla very sentence. HA, did you notice your conscious thoughts were “interrupted” two (2) times when reading that previous sentence. And iffen you mix them up and put those words with the transposed
                      letters in “list” form, it might prove frustrating in trying to figure out the correct spelling of some of them.

                      Cheers

                        Reply#7 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:19 AM EST

                        This is only one reason as a reading teacher to point out the importance of contwext and reading blocks of text as opposed to word by word.

                          Reply#8 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:37 AM EST

                          Actually it isn't. Whole word and block text reading is an end result, not a process. You must teach word by word phonetic reading first, and allow the sudent to develop naturally into the end result. Trying to cram the end result in before the process is learned retards the advancement of the student.

                            #8.1 - Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:30 AM EST
                            Reply

                            th3 fakt thet wee baleeve en tha gov't story ov evereething shows hour levil ov intellagents

                              Reply#9 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:54 AM EST

                              witch makes won wund3r about the importance that p3pl3 seem to place on spelling - - why the heck does it matter if people know what you are saying --

                              certainly when explaining complex or technical information a misspelling could result in misinterpretation but that is a very limited context, yeah?

                                Reply#10 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                The occasional spelling error or typo is unimportant, but when someone makes basic mistakes like the ever-present your/you're or they're/their/there, it's instinctive to question the education level of the writer. I see that and I automatically discount the value of the message; right or wrong, it's human nature.

                                By all means, write however you like, but if you want the maximum number of people to take you seriously, you need to use correct English.

                                • 7 votes
                                #10.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:38 PM EST

                                Actually, questioning someone's education level by their spelling is quite preconceived, maybe even prejudiced.

                                • 1 vote
                                #10.2 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:08 PM EST

                                Not really, we are all pretty guilty with making impression judgements on others. Face to face you may look at their clothes and figure (correctly or no) what their style of life is, or judge someone by their occupation. Likewise on the internet you can and will be judged by how you type. If you type with a massive amount of spelling errors, or in 'text' speak, one may not take you as seriously as another who types with correct spelling. I'm not saying it's right, but it's human nature. My spelling is pretty bad for the most part but I do make an effort, I don't see why others can't.

                                • 3 votes
                                #10.3 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:13 PM EST
                                Reply

                                Which explains the premise of speed reading, you skim and mentally eliminate verbage, filler, so you get to the jist of what you are reading.

                                  Reply#11 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:26 PM EST

                                  W4@7 7h3 Fu[{?

                                    Reply#12 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:27 PM EST

                                    I'm dyslexic so it looked perfectly normal to me.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#13 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:51 PM EST

                                    Dislxics Untie!

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #13.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:09 PM EST

                                    too I

                                      #13.2 - Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:32 AM EST
                                      Reply

                                      Ankyu SNBMBC . Nwo I Cna Curxe lla yiu mufokres tuo dna on eb edwori touab de fack!ng rotaidme

                                        Reply#14 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:37 AM EST

                                        Ack!!!! As an English teacher, I am now having a nervous breakdown!

                                        We have spent centuries perfecting the art of language and it takes less than three decades of computer use to completely screw it up; and you wonder why our kids are falling behind the rest of the world academically?

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#15 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:42 AM EST

                                        Probably because "lolgood" teachers are straight-up refusing to let kids learn from technology more advanced than @!$%# printed on paper.

                                          #15.1 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:57 PM EST

                                          There is nothing 'advanced' about l33t or Lolcat speak. It may be cute from time to time but it's certainly not advanced, you won't see too many jobs hiring people who fill out an application in those forms of language.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #15.2 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:17 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Jeff Hawkins in his book 'On Intelligence' discusses this very thing. The pre-firing of neurons in anticipation of a preconceived pattern is very interesting. Apparently new, unexpected perceptions trigger higher level processing to make sense of the new information creating new patterns in the higher level processing - learning, Another is when you enter a situation which you know will be novel, a room in a house you have never been in for example, and the 'this is different' circuitry doesn't fire immediately becomes the 'deja vu' experience.

                                            Reply#16 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:32 PM EST

                                            So I heard you liek mudkipz?

                                              Reply#17 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:32 PM EST

                                              I could read that just fine, it's just that the little voice in my head will change depending on what I'm reading.

                                                Reply#18 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:59 PM EST

                                                So im a natural brainiac!? I want a raise damnit!

                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#19 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:39 PM EST
                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.