We may hate laugh tracks -- but they work, studies show

NBC.com

Hahahaha, laughs the live studio audience watching NBC's new sitcom, "Whitney."

Two new fall TV shows premiering this week, "2 Broke Girls" on CBS and "Whitney" on NBC, are counting on an old-fashioned sitcom standby to help them get chuckles and ratings: the laugh track.

Some TV networks and producers may love to use laugh tracks, and some viewers have grown to accept them as part of a program's background noise, much like the music or special effects used in a drama. Others -- including many television critics -- loathe the made-for-TV mirth.

But no matter your opinion of the canned ha-ha's, shows continue to use them because they work! They're meant to make the audience at home feel like they're part of a bigger crowd sitting in a movie theater or at a comedy club.

"We're much more likely to laugh at something funny in the presence of other people," says Bill Kelley, a psychology professor at Dartmouth College in Hanover, N.H, who has studied the brain's response to humor. Hearing others laugh -- even if it's prerecorded -- can encourage us to chuckle and enjoy ourselves more. In fact, a 1974 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology showed that people were more likely to laugh at jokes that were followed by canned laughter.

Kelley's own research compared student's reactions to an episode of "Seinfeld," which has a laugh track, to those watching "The Simpsons," which lacks one. Brain scans suggested that people found the same things funny and the same regions of their brain lit up whether or not they heard others laughing.

While his findings may give reason to do away with a laugh track, Kelley still sees value in them. When done well, he says, they can give people pointers about what's funny and help them along. But when done poorly, he admits, you notice a laugh track and it seems unnatural and out of place. 

Some beloved shows, like "30 Rock," "Curb Your Enthusiasm," "Modern Family," "The Office" and "Glee," have said no to the laugh track, preferring the audience's authentic reactions to their humor and punch lines. They let viewers decide for themselves when and how much something tickles their funny bone.

But not all laugh tracks are created equal. Both "Whitney" and "2 Broke Girls" tape before a live studio audience and record the audience's giggles and guffaws. Even though they get a genuine human reaction to the show's jokes and humor, producers often "sweeten" a laugh track, meaning they edit it. 

Sound engineers might insert some chortles if a wisecrack fell flat or lengthen the time an audience spends cracking up. They may also tone down the woman who loudly cackles at the wrong times or the obnoxious guy who is perpetually in stitches.

For comedies that don't shoot live, such as "How I Met Your Mother," they rely on "canned laughter," a pre-recorded mix of tee-hees and chuckles that may sound phony. Hearing it may make you wish had a mute button for the synthetic snickers. 

Popular shows that currently dub in the yuks, whether they tape before a live audience or not, include "Two and a Half Men," "The Big Bang Theory" and "Mike & Molly." Past sitcom sensations, from "Seinfeld" and "Cheers" to "Friends" and "Frasier," also turned to some form of electronically enhanced giggles.

Do shows with TV laugh tracks make you yuk or say "yuck"? Can you tune them out or do they drive you crazy?

Want more weird health news? Find The Body Odd on Facebook.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

The only time I'd enjoy laugh tracks is when watching John Boehner or Mitch Mac talk about their sincere love of country.......

  • 15 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:12 AM EDT

The main reason I watch so few sitcoms is that the laugh track has always been annoying, and insulting. I don't want someone else to make the decision for me as to what I find funny, especially in my own home. I'm waiting for the gizmo to come out that will automatically delete the laugh track altogether.

  • 9 votes
#1.1 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:08 PM EDT

+1 mozzie.

I tried watching "Friends" once and was turned off by the laugh track. Never watched again.

It seemed so fake and ridiculous.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:33 PM EDT

I strongly prefer the laugh track as something I grew up with... Home Improvement, Roseanne... when there was a serious episode and you could hear a pin drop, it was sobering in contrast to the feeling that you were laughing along with others during the comedic parts. I get that younger generations are turning against it, but younger generations also made Jersey Shore popular, so let's not jump too quickly.

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:05 PM EDT

Laugh tracks are THE reason I do not watch sitcoms. Sitcom is short for Situation Comedy which tells you that something has been set up to be funny. Obviously set up. It is insulting to be told "this is where you laugh." I also find most of what is obviously set up to be funny is NOT funny. I prefer my laughs to come more naturally during the course of the story. One TV show that comes to mind is David Hewlett as Dr. Rodney McKay in Stargate: Atlantis (2004-2008). He portrays a scientist with a huge ego who is very insecure. He has great comic timing and I laugh out loud at his character every episode. I did watch an episode of Modern Family which blessedly has no laugh track and it is quite funny too, but not as funny as Dr. McKay. Anyway, in short I feel Laugh Tracks are insulting to my intelligence.

    #1.4 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:54 PM EDT

    Laugh tracks do not bother me. They've been around forever and I don't even notice them, nor do I notice their absence. What I do notice is the lack of something actually funny to laugh at. No amount of canned laughter can make me laugh at something that is juvenile or simply not funny.

    Interesting study though.

    • 4 votes
    #1.5 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:05 PM EDT

    the comment in the article "they can give people pointers about what's funny and help them along" pretty much says it all, we need to be told what is funny because we can't figure it out for ourselves. If you have to tell me its funny, its not funny.

    • 2 votes
    #1.6 - Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:04 AM EDT

    zero value

      #1.7 - Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:47 PM EST
      Reply

      I watched Whitney this week, thinking it should be good based on the previews. The laugh track really turned me off. The show had some funny moments but the laugh track made it look contrived.

      • 6 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:03 AM EDT
      Reply

      never noticed it before because there were in all comedies, like in seinfeld. but now that i've grown accustomed to it in shows like the office and parks and rec, when i watched 10 minutes of whitney last night it was awful. they "laughed" at every single joke. nobody is that funny in their pilot episode.

      Zooey Daschenel's new show on Fox was way funnier, and didnt' need a laugh trak

      • 2 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:31 AM EDT

      Laugh tracks drive me to change the channel.  Sometimes they're so loud I can't hear the dialog.  

      Here's an idea - put the laugh track on a separate audio track, and allow the watcher to decide whether to turn it on or off (similar to the way displaying Closed Captioning is a selectable choice). Updating televisions to accommodate this feature would be a good way to sell new sets.

      • 8 votes
      Reply#4 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:36 PM EDT

      I haven't watched a sitcom in years, and one main reason is because of those ridiculous laugh tracks. Ever since Annie Hall, where I was first introduced to the mechanics of dubbed-in laughter, I can never sit down to a comedy and just enjoy it. The whole episode becomes fake jokes & forced mirth.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:25 PM EDT

      If it weren't for laugh track, no one would be laughing at NBC's "Whitney"

      • 8 votes
      Reply#6 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:29 PM EDT

      I think I agree with that!

        #6.1 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:21 PM EDT
        Reply

        I don't like them at all, and I am surprised to see some shows are still using them. I thought they were a thing of the past by now...

        • 4 votes
        Reply#7 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:35 PM EDT

        The only real advantage I can see to the tracks is that it lets the person know its okay to laugh at something that outside a sitcom would be totally not political correct. Politically correctness has put everyone on guard during our everyday lives. The laugh tracks kind of say go ahead, let loose we intended this to be funny.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#8 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:04 PM EDT

        Good point in defense of the laugh track, troy1960.

        • 1 vote
        #8.1 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:31 PM EDT
        Reply

        I haven't done any studies on the matter, but I can say that for myself, I prefer TV comedies WITHOUT laugh tracks. The writing tends to be more intelligent in shows without laugh tracks and those that rely on them are more lower common denomninator sit-coms. That's not saying I would never watch a show with a laugh track, but I prefer them without.

        My favorite example of how well a show works without a laugh track: M*A*S*H. Thankfully the people who put the show on DVD had the wisdom to release it with an option to watch the episodes without the laugh track. Which I chose on every episode. I thought the show worked MUCH better without a laugh track, so much so that I cannot watch the show anymore with a laugh track.

        As far as using a laugh track to make the home viewer feel like they are part of a bigger crowd or something to that effect...then what about comedy movies on home video? We can watch those and find plenty of reasons to laugh and there's no laugh track involved there. I think we can live without laugh tracks just fine.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:08 PM EDT

        I am not opposed to laugh tracks, but it was W*A*Y overdone in "Whitney" on Thursday night. The laughs seemed to be at the end of every sentence regardless if it was funny and was very distracting.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#10 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:20 PM EDT

        I totally detest all the canned applause, laughter, etc. that they use on almost every show on tv. You might be watching a show where one of the stars might say something that's supposed to be comical, and the audience goes into hysterics even though what the star said was in no way funny, and there is no audience present. Game shows are just as bad. A contestant might get an answer right on something, and even though he didn't win anything yet the person in the sound booth hits a button and you hear the audience screaming and yelling for long lengths even though the audience you see in the background are just lightly applauding because the applause sign came on. It makes me sick and most times I just turn the show off because of how much it disgusts me. I guess it's the way it will always be and I'm sure there are a lot of people out there that don't know or even care about what is happening. I do.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#11 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:27 PM EDT

        I watched Whitney last night and though I generally thought it was funny, and will probably watch it again. I found the laugh tracks extremely annoying.I consider laugh tracks to be an affront to my intelligence; if I think something's funny, I'm going to laugh whether or not some sound engineer tells me to.

        Conversely, if the laugh track goes on when I don't think something is amusing, I get irritated; my concentration turns to the irritation and the show gets tuned out.

        I love Carol875's idea to put laugh tracks on a separate track so they could be turned off; I would love it if I never heard another one.

        • 7 votes
        Reply#12 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:36 PM EDT

        The article seems to imply that "Whitney" and "Two Broke Girls" "sweeten" the laughs but does not say so. Make a statement. Do "Whitney" and "Two Broke Girls" "sweeten" the laughs or don't they?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#13 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:53 PM EDT

        The only reason to use a laugh track these days is if your show isn't funny, but you're attempting to influence some braindead couchnugget into not changing the channel. It simply shows a complete lack of confidence in the material.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#14 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:55 PM EDT

        We watch every new show each year. If there is a laugh track, we turn it off in three minutes. And never go back. Never saw Seinfeld for that reason. Reference Stan Freiberg circa 1966 - he did a routine where he had large stick-shift type stick on stage and everytime he said anything funny, he pulled the stick and launched one of those awful laugh tracks. The track and its detractors have been around as long as the sitcom. But the TV producers and the TV channels -- the same ones that run animated characters ON TOP of a dramatic scene to PROMOTE their NEXT show -- call the shots. The public has no say. BUT the STARS could if they were to say NO to all this rudeness.

          Reply#15 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:58 PM EDT

          Throw some laugh tracks into those republican debates. They really belong there.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#16 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:10 PM EDT

          I would like to see that, just for the "Did That Just Happen?" shock value!

          I'm sure a laugh track version will be on YouTube soon, if not already.

          • 1 vote
          #16.1 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:51 PM EDT

          I had to look that up...yup :) Gotta <3 Youtube!

          • 1 vote
          #16.2 - Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:30 AM EDT
          Reply

          The problem with canned laughter is that it is painfully obvious: It starts all at once and stops all at once so it sounds unnatural. I watched 'Whitney' and could tell that the laughter was straight out of a can. I love 'Hot in Cleveland' and can tell that the laughs are coming from real people. It may be 'sweetened', but you can still tell that there are real people laughing.

            Reply#17 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:28 PM EDT

            I hear that the show "Office" doesn't use laugh tracks. I wasn't sure if they did or not. I watched a couple of times and figured they couldn't find anything someone would laugh at. Stupidity isn't all that funny. Unfortunately NBC is spouting out a lot of drivel along that line. The only good big four network sitcoms seem to be on CBS and ABC any more. Though I'd give Fox an A for effort.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#18 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:28 PM EDT

            If everyone turned off every show that had a laugh track or canned applause, tv would not exist. It's on almost every show. What is really ridiculous is most of those stupid comedies don't even have an audience.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#19 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:39 PM EDT

            I understand both sides, but I lean toward having a laugh track. 

            To me, it does two things...Just like I enjoy being in a live audience, a laugh track provides TV viewers with a feeling we aren't alone in our enjoyment of a show.  I mean, when something is funny, how many of us want to share it with others?  If you're alone, the laugh track helps us do that.

            Most TV comedies  throughout TV history were performed in front of an audience.  And even though the laughter was augmented by "canned laughter", there was still the real laughter of the audience., i.e., The Mary Tyler Moore Show. 

            Even more so, the "variety shows" of the 70's and 80's were performed in front of a live studio audience, too.  But there comedy was so funny, there was little need to augment it with fake laughter, although I'm sure it was used. 

            The queen of the contagious laughter shows, IMHO, was Carrol Burnett.  I used to watch it with my mother and just like her,  I laughed until I cried!  How many shows can do that now?  Seriously?  Does any show today make you laugh so hard your stomach hurts???

            What about "MASH"?  They did both, neither of which before a live audience.  I know the ones without dealt with serious subjects, but when they interjected humor, I didn't laugh as much as I did when the whole show was humorous and included a track.  But...that was their intent.

            Basically, laughter, whether live on TV or "canned" "signals" when something is supposed to be funny.  I mean, it dates back to jokes told by comedians during Vaudeville (no, I'm not that old). When a joke was told in front of a LIVE audience, the que to laugh was when they heard the "brrrum dump!" of a snare drum ending with the crash of a cymbal.

            Today, we have no que.  When I watch today's comedies, I feel uncomfortable, like I'm watching something that's funny in Wal Mart, but shouldn't REALLY be there to see it.  I mean, how many of us see something funny in public and laugh out loud?  Ok, I know there are some insensitive people that do.  But for me, again, it's just uncomfortable.

            Movies are not any different.  I can remember the times I laughed until I though I would get sick in the theater because it was so contagious with my friends and strangers laughing all around me.  But when I watch movies at home...mmm, not so much.

            And, well, that's it...laughter is contagious.  So tracks help bring the laughter trapped inside me flow. 

            My vote...bring laugh tracks back!

             

            • 1 vote
            Reply#20 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:55 PM EDT

            With today's tecnology there is no reason for a laugh track. A live audience reaction can be easily added to the taping. A laugh track today means you're not funny enough to get a crowd to laugh when you tested the show so you have to add laughter to try and convince someone what they saw is funny. If your not funny, a recording of someone laughing isn't going to convince a person they should be laughing. Unless that person can be sold a bridge in Brooklyn anyway.

            • 2 votes
            #20.1 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:26 PM EDT
            Reply

            Funny, I watched both sitcoms. I don't remember the laugh track on "2 Broke Girls". Probably because it was a funnier. "Whitney" had too many laugh tracks at stuff that wasn't even funny. It was very annoying. I liked the premise, and the girl is cute. Drop the laugh tracks or at least don't use them after every sentence. Ridiculous.

              Reply#21 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:58 PM EDT

              I heard an interview with Whitney Cummings and she said that the show is filmed in front of a live studio audience. That's some great research. This article is a waste of time.

                Reply#22 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:59 PM EDT

                I think the laugh track was way too loud, frequent and excessive to the point that it made the show unpleasant to watch no matter how funny it actually was.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#23 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:04 PM EDT

                Canned laughter doesn't even sound like real people laughing to me anymore. It really is like saying, "Hey Stupid, time to laugh."

                • 1 vote
                Reply#24 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:05 PM EDT

                Canned laughter isn't bad unless the jokes the laughter is applied to are not funny. The show Whitney is a good case in point. The writers of the show could not come up with a funny idea so they fell back on the old lets talk about sex formula. Example Whitney exclaims "Why aren't we tapping this" while geturing at her body, add laugh track. Now what is funny about that statement, nothing, so the laugh track made the line even less funny because the people listening recognize the line wasn't funny and the laugh track isn't going to make it so. If you can't make a live audience laugh your not funny so give it up.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#25 - Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:19 PM EDT
                Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.